Sugar Free Licorice Candy: What Replaces the Sugar

Sugar does two jobs, so the swap needs two ingredients

In an ordinary licorice sweet, sugar is structural as well as sweet. It provides bulk, controls how the paste sets, holds water in the piece so it stays chewable, and in a boiled drop it forms the glass that makes the candy hard.

Take it out and you have to replace both jobs, which is why sugar free confectionery almost always uses two sweeteners rather than one.

A bulk sweetener does the physical work. These are the sugar alcohols, also called polyols. They are roughly as bulky as sugar but only partly as sweet.

A high intensity sweetener makes up the missing sweetness at tiny doses. Steviol glycosides (stevia), sucralose and acesulfame K are the usual choices. They contribute no bulk at all.

What each sugar alcohol is used for

Sweetener: Typical use in licorice: Notes

Isomalt: Boiled and hard pieces: Very stable, resists moisture pickup, low sweetness so it needs help

Maltitol syrup: Soft and chewy licorice: Closest handling to glucose syrup, which is why it dominates

Sorbitol: Soft pieces, humectant: Keeps the piece from drying out, the most laxative of the common polyols

Xylitol: Coatings, pastilles: Cooling mouthfeel, roughly as sweet as sugar

Erythritol: Blends and coatings: Almost no calories, mostly absorbed before the large intestine, so usually the gentlest

Stevia or sucralose: All formats: Sweetness only, no bulk, used at fractions of a percent

Roughly speaking, most sugar alcohols land somewhere near half to two thirds the calories of sugar, with erythritol close to zero. That is a real reduction, but it is a reduction, not an elimination. A sugar free licorice is a lower calorie confection, not a free food.

The digestive caveat, stated plainly

This is the part that gets glossed over, so here it is without softening.

Sugar alcohols are only partly absorbed in the small intestine. What is not absorbed passes into the large intestine, where it draws in water and gut bacteria ferment it. In practice that can mean gas, bloating, cramping and a laxative effect. Sorbitol and maltitol are the usual culprits. Erythritol is generally gentlest, because most of it is absorbed and excreted before it gets that far.

How much it takes varies enormously. Some people eat a whole bag with no effect. Others react to a handful. Anyone following a low FODMAP plan or managing IBS is likely to already know polyols are on their list.

US and EU labeling rules both require a laxative-effect statement on products above defined sugar alcohol thresholds, which is why you see wording along the lines of "excessive consumption may produce laxative effects" on the pack. That is a regulatory requirement, not a marketing disclaimer, and it is there because the effect is real and predictable.

We are candy importers, not clinicians. Nothing here is medical or dietary advice. If a customer is asking because of a medical condition, the correct answer is the ingredient panel and their own healthcare professional, not us and not you behind the counter.

Sugar free does not change the licorice

One point that gets missed entirely in the sugar free conversation.

Real black licorice is flavored with licorice root extract, whose sweetness comes from a compound called glycyrrhizin. Removing the sugar does nothing to the glycyrrhizin, because the two are unrelated ingredients. The US Food and Drug Administration has published a consumer advisory about eating large amounts of black licorice, aimed particularly at adults over forty, and it applies to the sugar free version exactly as it applies to the regular one. If that is relevant to a customer, point them at the FDA's own page rather than at a summary.

Many black candies are flavored with anise oil instead and contain little or no licorice root, which we get into in licorice hard candy. The label is the only reliable way to tell.

One genuine advantage: teeth

Sugar alcohols are not fermented by oral bacteria the way sucrose is, which is why sugar free gum and mints are the products allowed to make dental claims in most markets. That advantage is real and it is narrow. It is a claim about tooth decay, not about calories, weight, blood sugar or health in general, and it should not be stretched into one. Our piece on whether Swedish candy is healthier takes the wider version of that question.

What to tell customers, in three sentences

If you stock sugar free confectionery, train the counter on this and nothing more.

1. "Sugar free, not calorie free. It has fewer calories, not none."

2. "It is sweetened with sugar alcohols. Some people find they upset their stomach, so start with a small bag."

3. "The ingredients and the warning are on the back. If it matters medically, read it or ask your doctor."

That script is short, accurate, and it protects you. Overselling a sugar free product as healthy is how you end up with a returned bag. The labeling rules behind it are covered in FDA candy labeling.

Where we stand

Plainly: we do not currently import a sugar free licorice line, or a sugar free line of any kind. Everything on our list is sugar sweetened. We would rather state that than take an order we cannot fill.

What we do publish carefully is dietary flags, and only the ones our supplier data actually carries. Every Matthijs item we hold is flagged gluten-free, halal, vegan and vegetarian, and most of the BUBS range is flagged gelatin-free and vegan. Where we have no data we publish nothing rather than guess, the same principle that stops us hand-waving about polyols. More in gluten-free Swedish candy and vegan Swedish candy.

Sugar sweetened lines with dietary flags we can stand behind

Matthijs Veggie Sour Cola Bottles 4.41lb Swedish Candy

$36.70

View product →

Matthijs Swedish Skulls 4.41LB Swedish Candy

$36.00

View product →

BUBS Wild Strawberry Pomegranate 2,8kg/6,17LB Swedish Candy

$51.00

View product →

S Marke Watermelon Vegan 8.81LB Swedish Candy

$59.00

View product →